Peran Evaluasi Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Proses Belajar Siswa

Robiah Ivadatun Nisa Nisa

Authors

Robiah Ivadatun Nisa Nisa UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA Author

Abstract

Evaluasi pembelajaran merupakan unsur pokok dalam sistem pendidikan yang menentukan arah dan kualitas proses belajar siswa. Fenomena yang menjadiperhatian dalam kajian ini adalah kecenderungan praktik evaluasi di sekolahyang masih menitikberatkan pada fungsi sumatif semata, sehingga potensievaluasi diagnostic dan formatif sebagai instrument perbaikan pembelajaranbelum dimanfaatkan secara optimal. Kesenjangan penelitian terletak pada minimnya kajian yang membahas ketiga jenis evaluasi, diagnostik, formatif, dan sumatif secara integrative dalam satu kerangka analisis yang utuh dan kohesif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran masing-masing jenisevaluasi trsebut serta kontribusinya secara sinergis terhadap peningkatankualitas belajar siswa. Pertanyaan penelitian yang diajukan meliputi: (1) bagaimana evaluasi diagnostik mengidentifikasi kebutuhan belajar siswa; (2) bagaimana evaluasi formatif memperbaiki proses pembelajaran secaraberkelanjutan; (3) bagaimana evaluasi sumatif mengukur pencapaiankompetensi: dan (4) bagaimana ketiga jenis evaluasi berkontribusi secaraintegrative terhadap kualitas proses belajar. Penelitian menggunakan metodeLibrary Research dengan teknik dokumentasi dan penelusuran literatur ilmiahdari jurnal nasional dan internasional bereputasi, buku referensi, serta dokumenkebijakan pendidikan. Analisis dilakukan melalui content analysis dan analisistematik terhadap literatur yang terpilih. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwaevaluasi diagnostik efektif memetakan kesenjanga pemahaman awal siswa; evaluasi formatif terbukti meningkatkan motivasi, regulasi diri, dan kualitasumpan balik; sedangkan evaluasi sumatif berperan dalam akuntabilitas capaiankompetensi. Secara integrative ketiga jenis evaluasi yang diterapkan secarasinergis dalam satu sistem yang kohesif mampu meningkatkan kualitas proses belajar siswa secara bermakna.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2015). Common Formative Assessments 2.0: How Teacher Teams Intentionally Align Standards, Instruction, and Assessment. Corwin Press.

Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. J. (2010). Handbook of Formative Assessment. Routledge.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. ASCD.

Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993026

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.

Gardner, H. (2011). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. Basic Books.

Harlen, W. (2006). On the Relationship Between Assessment for Formative and Summative Purposes. In Assessment and Learning (pp. 103–118). SAGE Publications.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Heritage, M. (2010). Formative Assessment: Making It Happen in the Classroom. Corwin Press.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Yovanoff, P. (n.d.). Diagnostic Assessments in Mathematics to Support Instructional Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.7275/VXRK-3190

Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative Assessment: A Meta-Analysis and a Call for Research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.

McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. ASCD.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Stiggins, R. J. (2007a). Assessment for Learning: An Essential Foundation of Productive Instruction. In Ahead of the Curve: The Power of Assessment to Transform Teaching and Learning (pp. 59–76). Solution Tree.

Stiggins, R. J. (2007b). Assessment for Learning: An Essential Foundation of Productive Instruction. In Ahead of the Curve: The Power of Assessment to Transform Teaching and Learning (pp. 59–76). Solution Tree.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and Student Success in a Differentiated Classroom. ASCD.

Weeden, P., Winter, J., & Broadfoot, P. (2002). Assessment: What’s in It for Schools? RoutledgeFalmer.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (Expanded 2). ASCD.

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Peran Evaluasi Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Proses Belajar Siswa

Authors

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

How to Cite

sidebarrye

submitrye

artikeltemplate

informationrye

flagcounterrye

Contact Us

Indexing